"... finora ero incline a considerare i surrealisti, che a quanto pare mi hanno eleto a loro patrono, pazzi completi (diciamo al 95 percento, come per l'alcol). Il giovane spagnolo, con i suoi occhi innocenti e fanatici e la sua innegabile maestria tecnica, mi ha indotto ad un'altra valutazione. Sarebbe in effetti assai interessante esaminare da un punto di vista analiticol'origine di quell'immagine". - Lettera a Stefan Zweig, 20 luglio 1938.
Freud  giunse a Londra il 6 giugno 1938. Gli furon concesse accoglienze quasi  trionfali: "... per la prima volta, e molto tardi, ho provato che cosa  vuol dire essere famosi", scrisse al fratello Alexander. Molte  personalità importanti vennero a fargli visita: Stefan Zweig portò con  sé il pittore Salvador Dalì nel luglio 1938, nell'oaccasione Dalì fece  uno schizzo ad inchiostro su carta carbone del volto di Freud (vedi  immagine qui sotto).
Dalí had been expelled from the surrealist camp and was turning towards the High Renaissance of Raphael. Yet, more than any other artist, he stood for surrealism in the mind of the general public. It was he who had made surrealism a common term. Before he turned his life style into a surrealist publicity gag, he had sought to make his art a pictorial documentation of freudian theories. The article on “paranoia” which he pressed on Freud did not have to do with psychiatric paranoia but with what he referred to as “critical paranoia”—a method of inducing and harnessing multiple images of persecution or megalomania. He would start a painting with the first image that came to mind and go on from one association to the next, attempting to lift the restrictions of control and thus tap a flow of delerious phenomena.
In so doing, Dalí was borrowing  from another surrealist, Max Ernst, and his method of “frottage.” Ernst  was making a deliberate effort to exclude all conscious mental guidance  of reason, taste and morals in order to become a spectator at the birth  of his own work. By restraining his own activity and accepting his  passivity, he discovered a sudden intensification of visual faculties.  What emerged was a succession of contradictory images superimposed on  one another as in a hypnagogic state or homospatial thinking.
All the surrealists believed, with Freud, in the central importance of the unconscious for art and poetry. They, too, were greatly concerned with the intensive study of the imagination. (The Surrealist Manifesto [1924] was written by André Breton, a serious student of Freud).  They conceived of the canvas as a blank table on which the artist  inscribed the visual associations issuing from the depth of his  personality. Chance, randomness, and coincidence, like the slip of the  tongue or the pen, or automatic writing, as well as the dream and the  irrational, were royal roads to the unconscious.
French symbolism was not only  the chief source of surrealism; it was, more importantly, one of the  main intellectual currents in Europe at the time of the birth and early  years of psychoanalysis . Also, like psychoanalysis, symbolism was drawn  to the further reaches of mental life searching for the many hidden  meanings condensed into a single sign. Despite failures and having  almost fallen into oblivion, the symbolist movement in France influenced  almost all eminent 20th century poets, such as Joyce, Proust and Stein,  as well as the drama (Maeterlinck), criticism and music (Debussy). It  also gave rise to similar schools in England, Germany and other  countries.
Since the symbolist movement in France was at its height towards the end of the 19th century, it is fair to ask, “Did symbolism influence Freud?”  Except for Baudelaire, who died in 1867, its most illustrious figures  flourished at the time Freud worked at Charcot's clinic in Paris  (October 1885-February 1886), as well as the next five years when Freud  was absorbed in the work of Charcot and Bernheim.
Freud considered the surrealists  “complete fools.” He dismissed the German expressionists as “lunatics”  in a letter to Otto Pfister. After an evening in an artist's company, he  wrote to Jones [1]: “Meaning is little to these men; all they care for  is line, shape, agreement of contours. They are given up to the  Lustprinzip.”
The day aftrer meeting Dalì  Freud wrote to Zweig that what changed his estimate was “that young  Spaniard, with his candid fanatical eyes and his undeniable technical  mastery” (italics mine). In other words, it was a dramatic and dynamic  contrast he sensed within Dalí which interested him. It was that special  combination of passion and control which Freud recognized—knowing it  well within himself.
In the 1920s-30s, Freud’s  theories  on the unconscious mind became so pervasive as to be taken for  granted  by the Surrealists.  Freud used the psychoanalytic device of  free  association to trace the symbolic meaning of dream imagery to its  source  in the unconscious; Dalí applied the same method to his  pictorial  imagery.
Based on  psychoanalytic studies of paranoiac dementia,  Dalí consciously charged  his paintings with psychological meaning which  he called his “paranoiac-critical method”,  using countless symbols of  persecution mania, sharp instruments  (castration), sexual fetishes, and  phallic images, many taken directly  from case histories of paranoia in  Dr. Richard von Krafft-Ebing's Psychopathia Sexualis, as well as from Freud’s works.
Paranoia   is a mental disease characterized by delusions and projections of   personal conflicts ascribed to the supposed hostility of others. Dalí’s   work imitates paranoiac conditions, because while the paranoiac is able   to find proof of persecution, Dali only simulated the illness.  He  used  paranoia less in the psychiatric sense than the etymological  sense: para, meaning alternate, noia  meaning mind. Thus,  his "paranoiac-critical method" became a forced  inspiration as Dalí  submitted his paintings at once to the caprice of  dream and wide-awake  calculation.  His images, based on readings in  psychiatry, eventually  began displacing experiences drawn from his own  psyche.  

Bibliografia:
1. Jones, E.: The Life and Work of Sigmund Freud. Volume 3. New York: Basic Books, 1957, p. 235 and p. 412;
2. Rose, G.J. (1983). Sigmund Freud and Salvador Dalí: Cultural and Historical Processes. Am. Imago, 40:349-353;
3. Ernst Freud, Lucie Freud e Ilse Grubrich-Simitis (1978). Sigmund Freud.
3. Ernst Freud, Lucie Freud e Ilse Grubrich-Simitis (1978). Sigmund Freud.
 
 
Nessun commento:
Posta un commento